[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
    On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 01:23 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > No. First, code that assumes GFP_KERNEL don't fail is stupid. Any
    > > allocation should always be assumed to potentially fail.
    > Stupid, yes. Uncommon? Not sure.

    A lot less than it used to be, we've been fixing those by the truckload
    over the past few years. But again, if allocations start failing that
    early at boot, you are likely to be doomed anyway. Still, better to do
    proper error handling, and I think we -mostly- do (ok, not -always-).

    > > Then, if you start failing allocations at boot time, then you aren't
    > > going anywhere are you ?
    > Exactly. So boot code should have access to all the memory, right?
    > Setting some aside for GFP_ATOMIC does not make sense in that context.

    I'm not certain what you mean here. If you're going to hit the atomic
    reserve that early, you aren't going anywhere neither :-)

    Is there any real problem you are trying to solve here or is it all
    just academic ?


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-20 01:53    [W:0.019 / U:3.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site