Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:32:42 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/7] add syscall tracepoints |
| |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > >> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls > >> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> > >> > >> --- > >> arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++-- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > >> index bd2c651..d16d195 100644 > >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > >> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ > >> > >> /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */ > > > > > > BTW, is there a way to know this size dynamically? > > Or is there already a hardcoded number of syscalls somewhere > > in x86? > > > > Does this patchset head for .31 or .32? If for .32, then this patch should > go into .31 I think.
Probably the best to run it through tip for a release. So, yes this patch should go to the beginning of the queue so that we can push it to 31 if need be.
-- Steve
| |