lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/7] add syscall tracepoints

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Li Zefan wrote:

> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> >> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls
> >>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++--
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> index bd2c651..d16d195 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> >>
> >> /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */
> >
> >
> > BTW, is there a way to know this size dynamically?
> > Or is there already a hardcoded number of syscalls somewhere
> > in x86?
> >
>
> Does this patchset head for .31 or .32? If for .32, then this patch should
> go into .31 I think.

Probably the best to run it through tip for a release. So, yes this patch
should go to the beginning of the queue so that we can push it to 31 if
need be.

-- Steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-19 05:35    [W:0.035 / U:14.936 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site