[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC
    On 06/18/09 09:08, Len Brown wrote:
    >> In principle, the local APIC and the I/O APIC are distinct (but related)
    >> components, which can be independently present.
    > bzzzzt, but thanks for playing:-)

    Perhaps I should have expressed that a bit more clearly: you could, if
    mad, build a machine with I/O APICs and some other mechanism for
    delivering the interrupts to CPUs. In practice, I doubt anyone ever
    has, or ever would.

    The only actual exception I know of is Xen's replacement of the physical
    local APIC with a paravirtualized interrupt interface.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-18 21:17    [W:0.018 / U:7.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site