[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC
On 06/18/09 09:08, Len Brown wrote:
>> In principle, the local APIC and the I/O APIC are distinct (but related)
>> components, which can be independently present.
> bzzzzt, but thanks for playing:-)

Perhaps I should have expressed that a bit more clearly: you could, if
mad, build a machine with I/O APICs and some other mechanism for
delivering the interrupts to CPUs. In practice, I doubt anyone ever
has, or ever would.

The only actual exception I know of is Xen's replacement of the physical
local APIC with a paravirtualized interrupt interface.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-18 21:17    [W:0.112 / U:2.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site