lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 6/9] tty: fix sanity check
Date
From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>

The WARN_ON() that was added to tty_reopen can be triggered in the specific
case of a hangup occurring during a re-open of a tty which is not in the
middle of being otherwise closed.

In that case however the WARN() is bogus as we don't hold the neccessary
locks to make a correct decision.

The case we should be checking is "if the ldisc is not changing and reopen
is occuring". We could drop the WARN_ON but for the moment the debug is more
valuable even if it means taking a mutex as it will find any other cases.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
index 939e198..a3afa0c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -1263,7 +1263,9 @@ static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty->count++;
tty->driver = driver; /* N.B. why do this every time?? */

+ mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
WARN_ON(!test_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags));
+ mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);

return 0;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-16 17:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site