[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: perf_counters: page fault trace record
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Paul Mackerras <> wrote:
>> Corey Ashford writes:
>>> Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>>> Can't you do what you need just using a page fault software
>>>> counter with sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR
>>>> and sample_period = 1?
>>> I thought about that, but I was under the (incorrect?)
>>> impression that on Power, the PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR would be set by
>>> the value of the SDAR register, which wouldn't be correct for
>>> the case of a page fault.
>> No, the PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR value only comes from SDAR for a hardware
>> counter overflow event. For the page-fault software counter the
>> PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR value will always be the faulting address.
> Corey, could you please add support for it in 'perf'? We dont want
> such sw-counter features to be in the kernel code without matching
> support in tools/perf/.
> While user data symbols wont be resolved, if we have a
> --target-address switch in perf record we could see the faulting
> frequency (and the fault coverage - and ordering as well) of shared
> libraries, in perf report and perf annotate.
> This would be a very useful facility.
> Thanks,
> Ingo

I'll see what I can do. This will be my first time modifying perf, so expect
that I won't do things the way you prefer the first couple of go-arounds :)


- Corey

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-15 22:41    [W:0.078 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site