lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] asm-generic: drop HARDIRQ_BITS definition from hardirq.h

[ Note: I prefer email to rostedt@goodmis.org over srostedt@redhat.com,
just because I don't read my RH email as often. ]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:43:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> linux/hardirq.h contains a fallback for HARDIRQ_BITS to 10
> if it's not defined, so it is pointless to define a default
> of 8 in asm/hardirq.h. There does not seem to be a good
> reason why an architecture would want to limit the number
> of hardirqs this way.

After reading the thread again (from the beginning) I have a better idea
of what you are talking about. But the above description is misleading.

The HARDIRQ_BITS has nothing to do with the number of IRQS, it has to
do with the number of nested irqs allowed. Heck, 8 should be goog enough.

But the only thing I object to about this patch is that discription.

>
> Reported-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/hardirq.h | 13 -------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> On Sunday 14 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > is there any downsides to using a "too large" value ? i.e. if my
> > system has less than 256, does it make any difference at all if it's
> > set to 10 ?
> > -mike
>
> None that I know of. I'm queuing this patch in my asm-generic tree now,
> unless Steven or someone else has a better idea.
>
> Arnd <><
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h b/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
> index 3d5d2c9..23bb4da 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/hardirq.h
> @@ -11,19 +11,6 @@ typedef struct {
>
> #include <linux/irq_cpustat.h> /* Standard mappings for irq_cpustat_t above */
>
> -#ifndef HARDIRQ_BITS
> -#define HARDIRQ_BITS 8
> -#endif
> -
> -/*
> - * The hardirq mask has to be large enough to have
> - * space for potentially all IRQ sources in the system
> - * nesting on a single CPU:
> - */
> -#if (1 << HARDIRQ_BITS) < NR_IRQS
> -# error HARDIRQ_BITS is too low!
> -#endif

For the content of the patch:

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Because it too is misleading.

The only reason I did not remove all arch defined HARDIQR_BITS and just default
it to 10 or 8, is because one of the archs had that hardcoded in the asm, and
I did not want to break it.

-- Steve

> -
> #ifndef ack_bad_irq
> static inline void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq)
> {
> --
> 1.6.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-15 18:47    [W:0.371 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site