Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:51:18 +0200 | | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][Fix] New Unified AVR32/AT91 MCI Driver that supports both MCI slots used at the same time |
| |
Haavard Skinnemoen : > Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Well, what is the best way to differentiate it from the at91_mci >>> driver and keep users from trying to use both drivers? >> I propose that we setup a kind of choice sub menu in the Kconfig for >> those two drivers when they are both supported. > > Shouldn't it be enough to simply add > > depends on !THE_OTHER_DRIVER > > to both of them?
It does not seems to work...
> Btw, what are the long-term plans for this? Should the at91_mci driver > be phased out once the atmel-mci driver supports all at91 and avr32 > devices?
In my opinion, it is a bit early to tell. My thoughts were that I suspect we should keep at91_mci for at91rm9200 and at91sam9261/9261s as they contain an older revision of the MCI IP. In the meantime, Rob tend to integrate also code to manage those chips (without RDPROOF/WRPROOF switch).
So, lets see how far we can go with the atmel-mci on at91 chips and then, consider a phase out.
Regards, -- Nicolas Ferre
|  |