[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][Fix] New Unified AVR32/AT91 MCI Driver that supports both MCI slots used at the same time
    Haavard Skinnemoen :
    > Nicolas Ferre wrote:
    >>> Well, what is the best way to differentiate it from the at91_mci
    >>> driver and keep users from trying to use both drivers?
    >> I propose that we setup a kind of choice sub menu in the Kconfig for
    >> those two drivers when they are both supported.
    > Shouldn't it be enough to simply add
    > depends on !THE_OTHER_DRIVER
    > to both of them?

    It does not seems to work...

    > Btw, what are the long-term plans for this? Should the at91_mci driver
    > be phased out once the atmel-mci driver supports all at91 and avr32
    > devices?

    In my opinion, it is a bit early to tell. My thoughts were that I
    suspect we should keep at91_mci for at91rm9200 and at91sam9261/9261s as
    they contain an older revision of the MCI IP. In the meantime, Rob tend
    to integrate also code to manage those chips (without RDPROOF/WRPROOF

    So, lets see how far we can go with the atmel-mci on at91 chips and
    then, consider a phase out.

    Nicolas Ferre

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-15 16:55    [W:0.139 / U:140.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site