Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:37:25 +0900 | From | Paul Mundt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported |
| |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:48:52AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:29, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > If the port does not support HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS, then they can't support > > the perf_counter_open syscall either. ??Rather than forcing everyone to add > > an ignore (or suffer the warning until they get around to implementing > > support), only whine about the syscall when applicable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > Andrew: could you pick this up since Ingo acked it now ?
I fail to see why this is necessary? cond_syscall() takes care of this in the not implemented case, the same as every other syscall backing some feature that has yet to be implemented.
| |