[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Make e100 suspend handler support PCI cards lacking PM capability

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:09:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday 14 June 2009, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Couple questions still:
> > - why do we call pci_wake_from_d3(...false) only!?
> > Wouldn't this break WoL after one iteration back and forth,
> > due to missing 'true' case?
> The 'true' case is the 'wake = true' one.

OK, so it wasn't an explicit pci_wake_from_d3(...true), but the
operations done there are the equivalent of it probably.

> > - why do we call netif_device_detach() _after_ doing hardware shutdown
> > of the network controller? I'd guess this can cause huge issues?
> > Someone told me he had rtnl lock issues upon S2D with e100
> > (very similar to my rtnl issues during aborted .suspend),
> > and that might possibly be the reason?
> I think you're right, but I'm not a network driver expert.
> Perhaps you can change the ordering and see if that fixes the rtnl issue
> (since you're able to reproduce it without my patch, that should be easy to
> verify).

I'll test this - later.

Thanks a lot,

Andreas Mohr

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-14 19:23    [W:0.059 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site