Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:49:22 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/13] cpumask: Use accessors for cpu_*_mask: arm |
| |
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:25:12PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:33:03 am Russell King wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:33:14PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions > > > are const). > > > > Please check linux-next - there are all kinds of SMP changes currently > > queued up in the ARM tree, which include most of the updates for things > > like this. > > OK, here's the revision based on latest linux-next, if you wouldn't mind > taking it. (We should really make on_each_cpu_mask an arch-indep, too).
Hmm, weird. Your diff is against does not correspond with my tree, which supposedly is in linux-next.
Commit 8266810 "[ARM] smp: fix cpumask usage in ARM SMP code" (in my tree since May 17th) fixes some of the areas which your patch touches. See:
http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-2.6-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/smp
I suggest hanging fire on this until the ARM tree is merged into mainline.
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of:
| |