[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
    > Sure, you'd always update the 'kernel-perftool' package (or whatever you'd 
    > call it) when you update the kernel. But so what? It's going to be tiny.
    > And appropriate.
    > IOW, where's the downside?

    Why you need to update the perftool not the kernel, which is very likely
    to be the case early on. There are ways for vendors to cope anyway - such
    as by deleting the tools directory from their kernel and keeping a
    separate perftool package that gets updated now and then from the kernel
    tree but is otherwise a fork


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-12 09:39    [W:0.019 / U:10.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site