[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fsldma: use PCI Read Multiple command

    On Jun 12, 2009, at 4:23 AM, Li Yang wrote:

    > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Ira Snyder<>
    > wrote:
    >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:45:26PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
    >>> On Apr 27, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
    >>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Timur Tabi <>
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>> Adding Kumar to the CC: list, since he might pick up the patch.
    >>>> Acked-by: Dan Williams <>
    >>>> I agree with taking this through Kumar's tree.
    >>> I'm going through patches for .31.. Should I still pick this up?
    >>> Going
    >>> forward should I pick up fsldma patches?
    >> I'm fine with that, but you should probably talk to Li Yang (added to
    >> CC). He's gotten in contact with me a few times recently.
    > I am fine with both ways for this patch as it is only related to
    > Freescale register details. But in general I think patches should go
    > through functional subsystem, as they usually would need insight of
    > the subsystem architecture. I prefer the way that the patch acked or
    > signed-off by Freescale guys and push upstream through Dan's tree as
    > most other subsystems did. Unless Dan prefers to ack the subsystem
    > architectural part of each patch and have them pushed other way.

    I agree w/this and just wanting to see what Dan's preference is.

    - k

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-12 17:09    [W:0.024 / U:98.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site