Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:08:10 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux |
| |
> > So you are saying that only good code comes from including it into > linux-2.6.git and otherwise you will never get there. Have you actually > tried to maintain this in a separate repository on kernel.org?
Could you please remind us what the arguments agains including a few seleted tools within the kernel source tree was.
I ask because I really cannot see why so much nosie is generated? As a naive user that like easy access to the stuff I work with this looks like an optimal place to find the kernel-hacking tools I need. Why should I hunt somewhere else to find it?
Sam
| |