Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:33:47 -0700 | | From | Jesse Barnes <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] pnp: add PNP resource range checking function |
| |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:09:44 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:53:59 -0700 > Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 10:28 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > Hi Frans, > > > > > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > >> Add a PNP resource range check function, indicating whether a > > > >> resource has been assigned to any device. > > > > > > > > Shouldn't this patch come *before* your patch 1/2? > > > > You now seem to use this function in a commit where it has not > > > > yet been defined, which could result in build errors during > > > > bisections. > > > > > > Yes, correct. Sorry about that! > > > > > > Pekka > > > > This is already in drm-intel-next > > > > Neither patch is in linux-next. So either a) drm-intel-next contains > 2.6.31 material or b) your processes broke.
drm-intel-next gets into linux-next by way of drm-next. Not sure if Dave has pulled Eric's bits yet though.
> Either way, these patches fix a "serious performance regression". > They should be merged into 2.6.30 or 2.6.30.x, shouldn't they?
I'm still a little nervous about this, but I won't block it. Since the commits don't have stable@kernel.org cc'd I guess Pekka will just have to send a note to stable when they go upstream.
-- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
|  |