lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
>>> I already have patches for that but they are against the -tip
>>> tree so I think we ought to just merge this series to mainline
>>> and fix everything up in subsystem trees for 2.6.31 proper.
>>
>> Hmm. Are there any reasons why the scheduler fixups can't go in
>> this series? Do they depend on other things in -tip?
>
> The patches are rebased to -tip, yeah. I can do a version against
> your tree if you want but that will mean merge conflicts for Ingo.
> Hmm?

I'm a tiny bit nervous about the tested-ness of the patches. Such
stuff rarely works at first try. But it's obviously nice changes.

What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat suggests
it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be much to conflict,
except kmemcheck - which has more or less trivial callbacks there.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-10 22:45    [W:0.079 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site