Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | | Date | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:31:28 -0400 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs |
| |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 13:04, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> While implementing ftracer and ftracer graph support, I found the exact >> arch implementation details to be a bit lacking (and my x86 foo ain't >> great). So after pounding out support for the Blackfin arch, document >> the requirements. > > This does not belong in the Kconfig. That's the last place a developer > will look for implementing something.
yes and no -- i was following the existing documenting practice of ftrace where details were added to the Kconfig. guess i should fix that in the process.
there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for implementation details. -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |