lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt()
> > fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with
> > the issue.
> > Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to
> > the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2
> > with another tick_nohz_disable().
>
> Any update on this one ?

I haven't heard anything from any Andy in regard to patch #1. We could
do patch #2 now and decide later what we want to do with the old style
profiler.

blue skies,
Martin.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-10 19:37    [W:0.085 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site