[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] partitions/ide: improve Host Protected Area handling
    On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:59:29 -0400
    Greg Freemyer <> wrote:

    > Alan, given your emphatic ack, is libata likely to follow the same
    > model. Any chance we could have a single boot param that handled both

    If the patches get in then it makes no sense not to implement them
    identically in libata.

    > drivers? I mean instead of having 2 module params.

    No because the modules have different names so it will always be
    ide_core.something and libata.something

    Bartlomiej - thinking about this I question "nohpa=" because we get into
    unneccessary negatives ide_core.hpa= is one less inversion to figure out.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-01 15:09    [W:0.034 / U:4.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site