lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
    Kenneth Crudup wrote:
    > Oh, and I can hit "ESC" in the middle of suspending with TuxOnIce and
    > back out of it if I'd changed my mind for whatever reason.
    >
    > There are(/were) competing ieee1394 OHCI drivers and competing Bluetooth
    > USB HCI drivers, and that's just off the top of my head- so having
    > competing suspend/resume methods won't be anything new. Let the market
    > decide which is best.

    The case of two 1394 driver stacks isn't fully comparable. I supported
    the addition of the second stack with the intent to replace the existing
    one after a transition period, and in the hope that the ratio of
    available maintainer manpower : size and complexity of the codebase
    would improve considerably. Because that was/is the single fundamental
    problem in Linux 1394 driver land.

    (Besides, how well is infrastructure like the suspend--resume framework
    comparable to drivers?)
    --
    Stefan Richter
    -=====-=-=== -=-= -==-=
    http://arcgraph.de/sr/


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-09 11:15    [W:4.190 / U:0.156 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site