[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> And we're now getting close to the point where the difference is
> virtually meaningless.
> At .14us, in order to see 1% CPU overhead added from PIO vs HC, you
> need 71429 exits.

If I read things correctly, you want the difference between PIO and
PIOoHC, which is 210ns. But your point stands, 50,000 exits/sec will
add 1% cpu overhead.

> The non-x86 architecture argument isn't valid because other
> architectures either 1) don't use PCI at all (s390) and are already
> using hypercalls 2) use PCI, but do not have a dedicated hypercall
> instruction (PPC emb) or 3) have PIO (ia64).

ia64 uses mmio to emulate pio, so the cost may be different. I agree on
x86 it's almost negligible.

I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-08 20:53    [W:0.142 / U:1.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site