Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 07 May 2009 13:03:45 -0400 | From | Gregory Haskins <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support |
| |
Chris Wright wrote: > * Gregory Haskins (ghaskins@novell.com) wrote: > >> Chris Wright wrote: >> >>> VF drivers can also have this issue (and typically use mmio). >>> I at least have a better idea what your proposal is, thanks for >>> explanation. Are you able to demonstrate concrete benefit with it yet >>> (improved latency numbers for example)? >>> >> I had a test-harness/numbers for this kind of thing, but its a bit >> crufty since its from ~1.5 years ago. I will dig it up, update it, and >> generate/post new numbers. >> > > That would be useful, because I keep coming back to pio and shared > page(s) when think of why not to do this. Seems I'm not alone in that. > > thanks, > -chris >
I completed the resurrection of the test and wrote up a little wiki on the subject, which you can find here:
http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/WhyHypercalls
Hopefully this answers Chris' "show me the numbers" and Anthony's "Why reinvent the wheel?" questions.
I will include this information when I publish the updated v2 series with the s/hypercall/dynhc changes.
Let me know if you have any questions.
-Greg
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |