[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
    Avi Kivity wrote:
    > Gregory Haskins wrote:
    >> (Applies to Linus' tree, b4348f32dae3cb6eb4bc21c7ed8f76c0b11e9d6a)
    >> Please see patch 1/3 for a description. This has been tested with a KVM
    >> guest on x86_64 and appears to work properly. Comments, please.
    > What about the hypercalls in include/asm/kvm_para.h?
    > In general, hypercalls cannot be generic since each hypervisor
    > implements its own ABI.
    Please see the prologue to 1/3. Its all described there, including a
    use case which I think answers your questions. If there is still
    ambiguity, let me know.

    > The abstraction needs to be at a higher level (pv_ops is such a level).
    Yep, agreed. Thats exactly what this series is doing, actually.


    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-05 15:43    [W:0.020 / U:10.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site