[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> (Applies to Linus' tree, b4348f32dae3cb6eb4bc21c7ed8f76c0b11e9d6a)
>> Please see patch 1/3 for a description. This has been tested with a KVM
>> guest on x86_64 and appears to work properly. Comments, please.
> What about the hypercalls in include/asm/kvm_para.h?
> In general, hypercalls cannot be generic since each hypervisor
> implements its own ABI.
Please see the prologue to 1/3. Its all described there, including a
use case which I think answers your questions. If there is still
ambiguity, let me know.

> The abstraction needs to be at a higher level (pv_ops is such a level).
Yep, agreed. Thats exactly what this series is doing, actually.


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-05 15:43    [W:0.227 / U:1.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site