[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on shared memory
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:14:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:12:27 +0100
> Mel Gorman <> wrote:
> > The following two patches are required to fix problems reported by
> > The tests cases both involve two processes interacting
> > with shared memory segments backed by hugetlbfs.
> Thanks.
> Both of these address, yes?
> I added that info to the changelogs, to close the loop.

Yes. I'm sorry, I should have included that information in the leader. I
had a niggling feeling I was forgetting something to add to the changelog -
this was it :)

> Ingo, I'd propose merging both these together rather than routing one
> via the x86 tree, OK?
> Question is: when? Are we confident enough to merge it into 2.6.30
> now, or should we hold off for I guess we have a week or
> more, and if the changes do break something, we can fix that in
> ;)

FWIW, I'm reasonably confident based on libhugetlbfs regression testing that
I haven't broken something new. If they make it into 2.6.30-rc8, so much
the better. Thanks.

Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-28 10:59    [W:0.110 / U:1.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site