Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform | | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | | Date | Fri, 29 May 2009 10:51:14 +1000 |
| |
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 17:04 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > We normally hide these subtle details behind a baseboard= kernel > parameter. I agree with you that it's far better to have a > standardized > way to specify this. For my taste the oftree is too bloated for this > purpose.
Define "bloated" ?
We got a lot of push back on powerpc initially with this exact same argument "too bloated" but that was never backed up with facts and numbers, and I would mostly say that nobody makes it anymore now that it's there and people use it.
Cheers, Ben.
|  |