lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci
>> for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb
>>
>> Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's
>> comments, Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate.
>>
>
> The original code added dom0-specific dma mapping stuff in the generic
> place, which is completely wrong. I asked you to move the hacky stuff
> to Xen-specific code and ack'ed the patchset.
>
> But as I said again and again, the dom0 changes to the generic dma
> mapipng code is really ugly and I don't like them at all. I didn't
> ack'ed such changes.
>

I didn't mean to imply that you all acked all the patches. I tried to
be careful to add Acked tags to the actual patches you each respectively
acked.

J



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-18 03:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans