Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 17 May 2009 18:42:04 -0700 | | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | | Subject | Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? |
| |
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci >> for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb >> >> Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's >> comments, Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate. >> > > The original code added dom0-specific dma mapping stuff in the generic > place, which is completely wrong. I asked you to move the hacky stuff > to Xen-specific code and ack'ed the patchset. > > But as I said again and again, the dom0 changes to the generic dma > mapipng code is really ugly and I don't like them at all. I didn't > ack'ed such changes. >
I didn't mean to imply that you all acked all the patches. I tried to be careful to add Acked tags to the actual patches you each respectively acked.
J
|  |