lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
______________________________________________________________
> Od: pavel@ucw.cz
> Komu: trekker.dk@centrum.cz
> CC: tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24
> Předmět: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
>
>Hi!
>
>> >> >To summarise disadvantages:
>> >> >
>> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC
>> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
>> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
>> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
>> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
>> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
>> >>
>> >
>> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
>>
>> Regarding hardware -
>>
>> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2
>> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT
>> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT
>> (binary driver for video card every time)
>
>Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should
>be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.
> Pavel

Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-13 22:29    [W:0.215 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site