Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 May 2009 22:19:25 +0200 | From | <> | Subject | Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce |
| |
______________________________________________________________ > Od: pavel@ucw.cz > Komu: trekker.dk@centrum.cz > CC: tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24 > Předmět: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce > >Hi! > >> >> >To summarise disadvantages: >> >> > >> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC >> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace >> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). >> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. >> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing >> >> > >> >> >> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. >> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) >> >> >> > >> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram? >> >> Regarding hardware - >> >> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2 >> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT >> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT >> (binary driver for video card every time) > >Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should >be easy to test with init=/bin/bash. > Pavel
Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |