lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/10] x86/PCI: Enable scanning of all pci functions
On Tue, 12 May 2009 14:48:07 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> From: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
>
> Xen may want to enable scanning of all pci functions - if for example
> the device at function 0 is not passed through to the guest, but the
> device at function 1 is.
>
> [Impact: allow passthrough of just some PCI functions.]
> Signed-off-by: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 8 +++++++-
> arch/x86/pci/common.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> index b51a1e8..092706e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct pci_sysdata {
> extern int pci_routeirq;
> extern int noioapicquirk;
> extern int noioapicreroute;
> +extern int pci_scan_all_fns;
>
> /* scan a bus after allocating a pci_sysdata for it */
> extern struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_on_node(int busno, struct
> pci_ops *ops, @@ -48,7 +49,11 @@ extern unsigned int
> pcibios_assign_all_busses(void); #else
> #define pcibios_assign_all_busses() 0
> #endif
> -#define pcibios_scan_all_fns(a, b) 0
> +
> +static inline int pcibios_scan_all_fns(struct pci_bus *bus, int
> devfn) +{
> + return pci_scan_all_fns;
> +}
>
> extern unsigned long pci_mem_start;
> #define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0x1000
> @@ -130,6 +135,7 @@ extern void pci_iommu_alloc(void);
>
> /* generic pci stuff */
> #include <asm-generic/pci.h>
> +#undef pcibios_scan_all_fns

This is a little gross... But then I don't see any places where it's
actually defined to something true either. Maybe it should be a weak
function or a new HAVE_FOO define instead.

--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-13 18:59    [W:0.105 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site