[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
> PF_SWAPWRITE mean ignore write congestion. (see may_write_to_queue())
> foreground reclaim shouldn't ignore it because to write congested device cause
> large IO lantency.
> it isn't better than remote node allocation.

It might be on NUMAQ (which is no longer manufactured), but
your change looks right for every other vaguely modern NUMA
architecture that I know of.

> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <>

All rights reversed.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-13 15:41    [W:1.900 / U:1.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site