lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
>
> PF_SWAPWRITE mean ignore write congestion. (see may_write_to_queue())
>
> foreground reclaim shouldn't ignore it because to write congested device cause
> large IO lantency.
> it isn't better than remote node allocation.

It might be on NUMAQ (which is no longer manufactured), but
your change looks right for every other vaguely modern NUMA
architecture that I know of.

> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

--
All rights reversed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-13 15:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site