lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
    KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
    > Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim
    >
    > PF_SWAPWRITE mean ignore write congestion. (see may_write_to_queue())
    >
    > foreground reclaim shouldn't ignore it because to write congested device cause
    > large IO lantency.
    > it isn't better than remote node allocation.

    It might be on NUMAQ (which is no longer manufactured), but
    your change looks right for every other vaguely modern NUMA
    architecture that I know of.

    > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
    > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
    > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

    Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

    --
    All rights reversed.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-13 15:41    [W:0.032 / U:29.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site