lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2
Jussi Laako wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>>As to the patch, I still think its an exceedingly bad idea to create
>>such a horridly ill defined scheduler class. There's nothing that keeps
>>people from stuffing everything in there and either generating DoS
>>issues or still generating bad interactivity.
>
>
> Lite patch practically exports nice levels as scheduling priorities in
> order to make it possible to assign different levels to different
> threads of the same process.

If all you're trying to do is allow different threads to run at
different nice levels, what about extending sys_setpriority() to take a
"which" of PRIO_THREAD? We'd probably have to call the syscall directly
until/unless libc picks up the new option.
Chris


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-12 17:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans