lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
Hi!

> >> >To summarise disadvantages:
> >> >
> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC
> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
> >> >
> >>
> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
> >>
> >
> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
>
> Regarding hardware -
>
> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2
> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT
> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT
> (binary driver for video card every time)

Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should
be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-11 23:27    [W:0.196 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site