lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0/3] PM: Drop shrink_all_memory (was: Re: [Bug #13058] First hibernation attempt fails)
Date
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:11:17 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Of course, this will protect the calling task from getting oom-killed.
> > > > But it doesn't protect other tasks from getting oom-killed due to the
> > > > activity of _this_ task.
> > > >
> > > > But I think that problem already exists, and that this proposal doesn't
> > > > worsen anything, yes?
> > > >
> > > > Or is it the case that all other tasks are safely stuck in the freezer
> > > > at this time, so they won't be allocating any memory anyway?
> > >
> > > That is the idea, yes. ... but we now have more threads that are not
> > > freezable... so they may allocate the memory.
> > >
> > > Is it non-feasible to free memory without really going and allocating
> > > everything?
> >
> > The question is whether there is a point. In principle we can just go and
> > allocate as much as we need upfront. It shouldn't change anything, because
> > we resume and suspend devices after creating the image anyway.
> >
> > I think we could try to disable the OOM killer before suspend and just
> > allocate the memory for the image right before devices are suspended for the
> > first time.
> >
>
> It would be nice to do.
>
> shrink_all_memory() is simply trying to do something which page reclaim
> doesn't expect to do (free memory when there's already lots of memory
> free). Consequently it doesn't do it very well, and there's a good
> risk that changes to core reclaim will accidentally break
> shrink_all_memory().

OK, a patchset follows:

[1/3] - disable the OOM killer during system-wide power transitions (should be
done anyway IMO)
[2/3] - move swsusp_shrink_memory() to kernel/power/snapshot.c so that the
next patch is easier to read
[3/3] - drop shrink_all_memory()

Please have a look and tell me what you think.

Thanks,
Rafael



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-02 00:35    [W:0.157 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site