[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] driver-core: devtmpfs - driver core maintained /dev tmpfs
    On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:16:22 +0200
    Kay Sievers <> wrote:

    > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 07:29, Andrew Morton <> wrote:
    > > dev->type->nodename() might have failed due to -ENOMEM, in which case
    > > it seems wrong to assume that it returned NULL for <whatever reason you
    > > thought it might want to return NULL>.
    > >
    > > It's all a bit confused.
    > This logic is only for providing a custom name hint. Only a few
    > devices need that at all. If the allocation fails, the default name
    > will be used, not the custom name.

    But that's bad, isn't it? It means that the kernel will come up with
    one name if the memory allcoation succeeded, and a different name if
    the allocation failed.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-01 21:31    [W:0.019 / U:70.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site