[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/16] DRBD: a block device for HA clusters
    On Fri, 1 May 2009 09:14:25 -0400
    Dave Jones <> wrote:

    > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:15:54PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
    > > > Is it being used anywhere for anything? If so, where and what?
    > >
    > > It is used by many customers (thousands world-wide, I'm sure) to
    > > replicate block device data locally (to replace more expensive SANs
    > > while achieving higher availablity) or async/remotely (for disaster
    > > recovery).
    > >
    > > The code is rather stable, the first drbd deployments date back many
    > > years - drbd0.7 for example has been shipping with SLES10/9, and 0.6
    > > with SLES8 already. The new drbd8 code is shipping on SLE11 and used
    > > also in combination with OCFS2.
    > >
    > > So we very much welcome the renewed and persistent interest of merging
    > > the code in mainline (once all serious issues are addressed).
    > >
    > > Even if in the long-term a merge with other raid implementations is
    > > pursued (which I'd welcome even more), the existence of so many
    > > deployments means we'll need the code for awhile still.
    > I've not looked through the patchset, and it's a bit outside my
    > domain of expertise, but I can attest we have had requests to
    > merge it in Fedora (which we've given the usual "get it upstream" response to).
    > The folks who run the Fedora infrastructure have been enthusiastic
    > about it for a while (which is why I ended up on the CC for this thread I guess).
    > I don't have details about their exact use-cases, but if desired, I can
    > find out more.

    Oh. Thanks. Well we should all get cracking on it then.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-01 21:27    [W:0.032 / U:6.788 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site