Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 May 2009 09:55:52 -0700 | From | Chris Wedgwood <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (devtmpfs) |
| |
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:28:33AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfs_mkdir' > drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:46: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
[...]
Why is devtmpfs in linux-next? My read of the thread so far seems to indicate there is considerable uncertainty that this is necessary or desirable.
Without going into the meris of devtmpfs, I think if nothing else it's still too early to make a decision on whether to merge this or not.
| |