lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements, faster than Bkl based scheme
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> >
> > I've pulled it and have also merged -rc4 into the kill-the-BKL tree,
> > which can picked up from here:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core/kill-the-BKL
> >
> > So for comparative benchmarking, vanilla v2.6.30-rc4 (which has the
> > BKL) can be compared against latest kill-the-BKL
>
> Hi,
>
> Kernel gets soft-locked-up in somewhere in initrd:
>
> See
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0524.jpg
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0525.jpg
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0526.jpg
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0527.jpg
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0528.jpg
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0529.jpg


Looks like someone owns the kernel lock and is sleeping
with the assumption it releases the lock, like the old bkl did.


> config is:
> http://m3y3r.de/bilder/config-2.6.30-rc4-ktb


Thanks, I will try it out once I have some time.


> greets
> thomas
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-01 16:15    [W:0.067 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site