Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 May 2009 16:12:09 +0200 | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements, faster than Bkl based scheme |
| |
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > > > I've pulled it and have also merged -rc4 into the kill-the-BKL tree, > > which can picked up from here: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core/kill-the-BKL > > > > So for comparative benchmarking, vanilla v2.6.30-rc4 (which has the > > BKL) can be compared against latest kill-the-BKL > > Hi, > > Kernel gets soft-locked-up in somewhere in initrd: > > See > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0524.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0525.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0526.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0527.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0528.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0529.jpg
Looks like someone owns the kernel lock and is sleeping with the assumption it releases the lock, like the old bkl did.
> config is: > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/config-2.6.30-rc4-ktb
Thanks, I will try it out once I have some time.
> greets > thomas > >
| |