[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] romfs: cleanup romfs_fs.h
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:44:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:44:57PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:07:08PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > There's no kernel-only content in it anymore, so move it to header-y
> > > and remove the superflous #ifdef __KERNEL__.
> >
> > today there is no difference between header-y and unifdef-y.
> > We pass everything through unifdef these days.
> The __KERNEL__ removal still applies, and as long as we have two
> different variables it should use the correct one.
> But why do you send all through unifdef anyway? That's a pretty bad
> signal to send when we try to get people to do cleanly seprated headers.

We saw too many cases where headers was not assigned to unifdef-y
after introducing "#ifdef __KERNEL__".
So we integrated the install and unifdef step to avoid this.
And with the header stuff in kbuild redesigned the cost was acceptable to do so.

When I get some spare time I plan to re-implement the unifdef tool
so it does exactly what we want it to do so we can skip the
perl/unifdef stuff we have today.

And I should sent a patch to Linus to get rid of unifdef-y so not to
confuse people.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-07 19:53    [W:0.023 / U:13.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site