lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: intel-iommu: Add for_each_iommu() and for_each_active_iommu() macros
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:19:06 -0700
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:09 -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > I'm unconvinced by the fix -- can we find a way to fix the if() macro so
> > that normal (if fugly) C code like this doesn't doesn't need this kind
> > of workaround?
>
> Something like this perhaps? I'd reformat it but dinner calls...
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index 6faa7e5..1da2e72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
> * "Define 'is'", Bill Clinton
> * "Define 'if'", Steven Rostedt
> */
> -#define if(cond) if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
> +#define if(cond, ...) if (__builtin_constant_p((cond, ## __VA_ARGS__)) ? !!(cond, ## __VA_ARGS__) : \
> ({ \
> int ______r; \
> static struct ftrace_branch_data \
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
> .file = __FILE__, \
> .line = __LINE__, \
> }; \
> - ______r = !!(cond); \
> + ______r = !!(cond, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
> ______f.miss_hit[______r]++; \
> ______r; \
> }))

That would be better. If it works, please send something Linuswards?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-07 03:29    [W:0.071 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site