lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: intel-iommu: Add for_each_iommu() and for_each_active_iommu() macros
FromDavid Woodhouse <>
DateMon, 06 Apr 2009 18:09:43 -0700
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Three days old? Never been in linux-next afaict.
>
> Please don't do that.

Sorry about that. There was some confusion about whether it was going
via Ingo's or my tree, and it ended up in neither. It depended on
certain things in Ingo's tree, so I couldn't easily add it to my tree
any earlier.

I'm unconvinced by the fix -- can we find a way to fix the if() macro so
that normal (if fugly) C code like this doesn't doesn't need this kind
of workaround?
(Yes, it's fugly. But the original was worse IMHO:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/iommu/attachments/20090327/31f84f7d/attachment.txt )

--
dwmw2



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-07 03:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2010