Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: intel-iommu: Add for_each_iommu() and for_each_active_iommu() macros | | From | David Woodhouse <> | | Date | Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:09:43 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Three days old? Never been in linux-next afaict. > > Please don't do that.
Sorry about that. There was some confusion about whether it was going via Ingo's or my tree, and it ended up in neither. It depended on certain things in Ingo's tree, so I couldn't easily add it to my tree any earlier.
I'm unconvinced by the fix -- can we find a way to fix the if() macro so that normal (if fugly) C code like this doesn't doesn't need this kind of workaround? (Yes, it's fugly. But the original was worse IMHO: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/iommu/attachments/20090327/31f84f7d/attachment.txt )
-- dwmw2
|  |