[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Cool! Maybe we can make things even better, but given where we are
> at, this brings up an question: given Jens block latency patches
> (thanks, Jens!), and the patches which add the flush on
> replace-via-rename/replace-via-truncate for ext3 data=writeback,
> should we make ext3 data=writeback the default for 2.6.30?

Yes. I want to go back and see how much this all helps for the
data=ordered case (if at all), but I think we should at least consider
trying 'data=writeback' as a default.

Does the 'synchronize on rename / close-after-ftrucate' patches leave any
other intersting cases open?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-06 22:01    [W:1.863 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site