| | Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:55:55 -0700 | | From | Greg KH <> | | Subject | [patch 06/88] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state.c |
| |
2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------ From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7d0b591c655ca0d72ebcbd242cf659a20a8995c5 ]
spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state_walk_done().
caused by: commit 12a169e7d8f4b1c95252d8b04ed0f1033ed7cfe2 "ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list"
Reported-by: Marc Milgram <mmilgram@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_st spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock); list_del(&walk->all); - spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_walk_done);
|