Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:04:54 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Next April 24: [S390] allmodconfig build failure (trace/events) |
| |
* Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:21:39 +0530 > Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com> wrote: > > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:25:33 +0200 > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > >> * Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com> wrote: > > >>> Today's next tree build(s390 allmodconfig) failed with > > >>> > > >>> kernel/built-in.o: In function `trace_softirq_entry' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:42: undefined reference to > > >>> `' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:42: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_entry' > > >>> kernel/built-in.o: In function `trace_softirq_exit': > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:48: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_exit' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:48: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_exit' > > >>> > > >> Hm, that's weird - s390 does not build kernel/softirq.o? Hm, it does > > >> - softirq.o is an obj-y object. > > > > > > s390 does build kernel/softirq.o. However it's anything but obvious to > > > me how the tracepoint infrastructure works. Too many #ifdefs, #define's > > > and #undefine's... > > > > > > I would expect that struct __tracepoint_softirq_entry somehow gets > > > defined via one of the TRACE_FORMAT macros, no? > > Today's next tree also has this failure. Any solution for this problem ? > > Ingo, could you pick up the patch below please?
applied, thanks Heiko!
Ingo
| |