lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: LTTng "TIF_KERNEL_TRACE"

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > No, read-write lock is a "special case" where it does not deadlock if
> > you have an interrupt handler taking the read lock over another read
> > lock. It's just the write lock that _must absolutely_ disable
> > interrupts.
>
>
> Ah, you're right, I was thinking with spinlock rules in mind :)
>

The only time you would want to do a read_lock_irqsave is if the
write_lock is taken in irq context. But I do not know of any lock where
that is the case.

-- Steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-28 18:55    [W:0.088 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site