lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: how to properly post/disseminate kernel cleanup/janitorial possibilities?
[added Jiri on CC]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:46:46PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> since i, on an occasional basis, run a set of scanning scripts i
> wrote and promptly annoy the crap out of everyone with the results,
> i'm open to the proper way to do this scanning and get the results out
> there to people who might be interested while not bugging those folks
> who aren't.
>
> a while back, a few people suggested a wiki page, while others
> disagreed, suggesting that no one will follow a link to a wiki page
> and will only read what's directly on the list. grapple, grapple.
>
> in the end (as i'm sure you're aware by now), i post the results
> here:
>
> http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Kernel_cleanup
>
> i'm convinced that there's value in the links i've promoted lately --
> scanning Kconfig files for unused or "bad" CONFIG variables, not just
> to clean historical cruft out of those files but because, on occasion,
> the scanning really does track down typoes and errors.
>
> not quite so critical is a "style" script i wrote, which looks for
> places to simplify code by using some of the macros/functions defined
> in include/linux/kernel.h. i ran that script again earlier today, and
> posted only *some* of the results here:
>
> http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/The_style_script
>
> long story short, i have a *pile* of scripts and sub-scripts i'm happy
> to run and post the results of since it takes practically zero time on
> my part, i'm just open to what folks think is the most productive way
> to do that, and also for any other scanning i can add since, by now,
> any other patterns to scan for would just represent adding a line or
> two to a script.
>
> thoughts?

Yes. I wonder why you take the time to generate the output and email
it but then stop there instead of just sending patches?

grep -A5 TRIVIAL MAINTAINERS

Perhaps Jiri can pick up some of the patches that remove stale config
symbols, correct typos etc.

Yes, these corrections take care of cruft. But I think installing
output of scripts on wiki pages and asking for other people to fix
them up is more than these things deserve. It's a bit like writing a
list containing

- wash up mug
- grind beans
- boil water
- put grinded beans in mug
- put filter in mug
- put hot water in mug

instead of just making coffee already.

Hannes


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-28 00:25    [W:0.047 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site