Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:02:01 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfs: umount_begin BKL pushdown v2 |
| |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:55:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Nah, it's not that. I can hold that in a separate branch and keep it > anchored. The question is, what else will end up there? > * the work inside the methods on BKL _removal_ > * things like merging that ->write_super() call into ->put_super(), > etc. > * probably parts of work on s_flags mess and ro (tied to remout)
* moving lock_super from callers into ->write_super and ->remount_fs. No need to only push one lock down when we touch them anyway.
| |