Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:50:49 +0900 | | From | Paul Mundt <> | | Subject | Re: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb |
| |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:02:06AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > One minor nit: the patch should define an empty static inline of > > > claim_remote_free_list() for the !SMP case. I can fix it at my end > > > before merging, though, if necessary. > > > > Agreed. It would be better to have an empty static inline than > > adding the noisy #ifdef SMP around every call to > > claim_remote_free_list() ... in fact some such #ifdef can be > > removed. > > > > You could tag such a modified patch (attached) as: > > > > Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > > Thanks for the help! I went and merged the following patch and I hope I > got all the patch attributions right. Paul, does this work for you as well? > Yup, works fine for me, thanks for taking care of this.
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
|  |