lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb
    On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:02:06AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
    > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Luck, Tony wrote:
    > > > One minor nit: the patch should define an empty static inline of
    > > > claim_remote_free_list() for the !SMP case. I can fix it at my end
    > > > before merging, though, if necessary.
    > >
    > > Agreed. It would be better to have an empty static inline than
    > > adding the noisy #ifdef SMP around every call to
    > > claim_remote_free_list() ... in fact some such #ifdef can be
    > > removed.
    > >
    > > You could tag such a modified patch (attached) as:
    > >
    > > Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
    >
    > Thanks for the help! I went and merged the following patch and I hope I
    > got all the patch attributions right. Paul, does this work for you as well?
    >
    Yup, works fine for me, thanks for taking care of this.

    Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-04-23 07:59    [W:0.028 / U:30.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site