lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:02:06AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > One minor nit: the patch should define an empty static inline of
> > > claim_remote_free_list() for the !SMP case. I can fix it at my end
> > > before merging, though, if necessary.
> >
> > Agreed. It would be better to have an empty static inline than
> > adding the noisy #ifdef SMP around every call to
> > claim_remote_free_list() ... in fact some such #ifdef can be
> > removed.
> >
> > You could tag such a modified patch (attached) as:
> >
> > Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>
> Thanks for the help! I went and merged the following patch and I hope I
> got all the patch attributions right. Paul, does this work for you as well?
>
Yup, works fine for me, thanks for taking care of this.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-23 07:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site