Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [kvm] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus | | From | Alex Williamson <> | | Date | Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:02:54 -0600 |
| |
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:18 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >>> I don't think we even need that to end this debate. I'm convinced > >>> we have a bug somewhere. Even disabling TX mitigation, I see a ping > >>> latency of around 300ns whereas it's only 50ns on the host. This > >>> defies logic so I'm now looking to isolate why that is. > >> > >> I'm down to 90us. Obviously, s/ns/us/g above. The exec.c changes > >> were the big winner... I hate qemu sometimes. > > Anyway, if we're able to send this many packets, I suspect we'll be able > to also handle much higher throughputs without TX mitigation so that's > what I'm going to look at now.
Anthony,
Any news on this? I'm anxious to see virtio-net performance on par with the virtual-bus results. Thanks,
Alex
|  |