[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add MCE support to KVM
On 04/20/09 13:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> Well, xenner doesn't do vmcalls, so the page isn't vendor specific.
>>> Well, for true pv (not pv-on-hvm) it wouldn't use the MSR, would it?
>> Yes, the MSR is used for pv-on-hvm only.
> So it isn't relevant for Xenner?

It is. I still plan to merge xenner into qemu, and also support
xenstyle pv-on-hvm drivers.

> That said, I'd like to be able to emulate the Xen HVM hypercalls. But in
> any case, they hypercall implementation has to be in the kernel,

No. With Xenner the xen hypercall emulation code lives in guest address

> so I
> don't see why the MSR shouldn't be.

I don't care that much, but /me thinks it would be easier to handle in
userspace ...

> Especially if we need to support
> tricky bits like continuations.

Is there any reason to? I *think* xen does it for better scheduling
latency. But with xen emulation sitting in guest address space we can
schedule the guest at will anyway.

>> Same MSR, multiple writes (page number in the low bits).
> Nasty. The hypervisor has to remember all of the pages, so it can update
> them for live migration.

Xenner doesn't need update-on-migration, so there is no need at all to
remember this. At the end of the day it is just memcpy(guest, data,
PAGESIZE) triggered by wrmsr.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-20 14:23    [W:0.081 / U:3.544 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site