[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: EXT4-ish "fixes" in UBIFS
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> Oh, I should have clarified. It improves performance under heavy
> load. Under normal load, mounting without sync is fine. What I tend
> to do is mount with "remount,rw,sync" when heavy load is starting.

Really? How does mounting with "-o sync" *improve* performance? I am
certainly aware that mounting with "-o sync" has severe performance
impacts, but was proposing it anyway *only* to tackle the data integrity
problem. However, I'm curious if usescaes in the embedded world are
equally affected by this.

> I'm thinking of writing a script that monitors performance, and
> remounts as needed, lol. WHAT A HACK. hehe. brain hurts :-\

Bruce Schneier once found three distinct natural number divisors of a prime

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-03 02:41    [W:0.122 / U:7.620 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site