Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:52:51 -0400 | From | Gregory Haskins <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| |
Gregory Haskins wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > >> there will *never* be another packet in the queue >> at this point, since it wasn't running. >> >> > Yep, and I'll be the first to admit that my design only looks forward. > To clarify, I am referring to the internal design of the venet-tap only. The general vbus architecture makes no such policy decisions.
-Greg
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |