[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v3
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 10:56 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 13:39 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:22 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > > This passed a longer stress test and generally seems to be working. I
> > > don't think anyone would recommend it as a default for 2.6.30, but it
> > > may be a good idea to have a review party and decide if it is safe enough
> > > to include so people can experiment with it.
> >
> > I know you didn't say RFT, but I did some anyway, and found a 100%
> > repeatable corruption scenario wrt git+umount.
> >
> Well, that's a surprise. I can trigger it here too, trying to figure
> out how this is different from the fsx and fsstress hammering. It looks
> like git is just going good old fashioned writes, so I must be losing
> one or two of them.

Ah ok, it is just a missed i_size update. Basically because file_write
doesn't wait for page writeback to finish, someone can be updating
i_size at the same time the end_io handler for the last page is running.

Git triggers this when it does the sha1flush just before closing the

I'm testing the fixes here, will resend in a little bit.



 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-16 19:17    [W:0.085 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site